Supreme Court Sides with Maryland Parents Over LGBTQ+ Curriculum Dispute

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that public schools must accommodate parental religious objections to classroom materials, siding with a group of Maryland parents in a 6–3 decision released Friday, June 27th.

The case, Mahmoud v. Taylor, challenged the Montgomery County Board of Education’s refusal to let parents opt their children out of lessons involving LGBTQ+-themed storybooks. The Court determined that the district’s policy infringed on families’ First Amendment rights by forcing children to engage with content that runs counter to their religious convictions.

Writing for the majority, Justice Samuel Alito described the district’s stance as a substantial interference with religious upbringing. The ruling orders Montgomery County schools to notify parents in advance when such materials will be used and to provide alternative participation options for students whose families object.

Titles at the center of the dispute include Born Ready, which features a transgender protagonist, and Prince & Knight, a same-sex love story.

Education Secretary Linda McMahon welcomed the decision, saying it allows parents, not bureaucrats, to reclaim their role in raising children according to their beliefs.

Critics warned the ruling could open the door to wider objections against school content. Reverend Paul Brandeis Raushenbush of the Interfaith Alliance said it may be used to block inclusive education, calling it a risk to classrooms becoming “battlegrounds of ideological exclusion.”

Justice Sonia Sotomayor, in dissent, said the decision weakens the core mission of public education and could burden schools with managing a flood of religious opt-out requests.

The legal battle began after the district rescinded its opt-out option in 2023, citing logistical difficulties. The plaintiffs included families from Muslim, Catholic, and Ukrainian Orthodox backgrounds.